The Existence of God can be proved in five ways by St. Thomas Aquinas

While I am not a Catholic, though I was raised as one, there are a great number of things that we can learn from the vast numbers of church fathers and leaders that paved the way after the death and resurrection of Jesus. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) was brilliant in his faith as a friar, priest, philosopher, theologian, and jurist. No less than a thousand plus times his works have been quoted by other church fathers, leaders, philosophers, and theologians; not to mention the great numbers of teachers and scholars.

While listening to the Dr. Scott M. Sullivan course CHRIST 101 this was mentioned by a Dr. Peter Kreeft who was interviewed and I just had to see what this man had said on the subject.

Since we are called to “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’” ~Matthew 22:37 NIV This indicates we are to follow reason, intellect, and wisdom…not the fallacy of having faith such that we hold no reasons as to why we believe all that we do. We are raised to believe, generally by our parents, but that is a child like faith sometimes with and other times without any reasoning. As we grow older we have an obligation to also grow our faith. Sometimes, with some of us, this may not occur until our late 40s to early 50s…GUILTY! But we also need a better support system in order to do so prior to this time in our lives. Just remember there are those who have known and stuck with their faith early on in life. But for those of us who got lost along the way, Jesus spoke of you in The Parable of the Lost Sheep, The Parable of the Lost Coin, and The Parable of the Lost Son all three parables are in Luke 15.

Hope you enjoy this, as well as the argument analysis.

May God Richly Bless You!

MK Murphy, PhD, DD

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ORIGINAL ARTICLE FOLLOWS<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

St. Thomas Aquinas: 
The Existence of God can be proved in five ways.
Argument Analysis of the Five Ways         © 2016 Theodore Gracyk
The First Way: Argument from Motion

  1. Our senses prove that some things are in motion.
  2. Things move when potential motion becomes actual motion.
  3. Only an actual motion can convert a potential motion into an actual motion.
  4. Nothing can be at once in both actuality and potentiality in the same respect (i.e., if both actual and potential, it is actual in one respect and potential in another).
  5. Therefore nothing can move itself.
  6. Therefore each thing in motion is moved by something else.
  7. The sequence of motion cannot extend ad infinitum.
  8. Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other; and this everyone understands to be God.

The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes

  1. We perceive a series of efficient causes of things in the world.
  2. Nothing exists prior to itself.
  3. Therefore nothing [in the world of things we perceive] is the efficient cause of itself.
  4. If a previous efficient cause does not exist, neither does the thing that results (the effect).
  5. Therefore if the first thing in a series does not exist, nothing in the series exists.
  6. If the series of efficient causes extends ad infinitum into the past, for then there would be no things existing now.
  7. That is plainly false (i.e., there are things existing now that came about through efficient causes).
  8. Therefore efficient causes do not extend ad infinitum into the past.
  9. Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.

The Third Way: Argument from Possibility and Necessity (Reductio argument)

  1. We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, that come into being and go out of being i.e., contingent beings.
  2. Assume that every being is a contingent being.
  3. For each contingent being, there is a time it does not exist.
  4. Therefore it is impossible for these always to exist.
  5. Therefore there could have been a time when no things existed.
  6. Therefore at that time there would have been nothing to bring the currently existing contingent beings into existence.
  7. Therefore, nothing would be in existence now.
  8. We have reached an absurd result from assuming that every being is a contingent being.
  9. Therefore not every being is a contingent being.
  10. Therefore some being exists of its own necessity, and does not receive its existence from another being, but rather causes them. This all men speak of as God.

The Fourth Way: Argument from Gradation of Being

  1. There is a gradation to be found in things: some are better or worse than others.
  2. Predications of degree require reference to the “uttermost” case (e.g., a thing is said to be hotter according as it more nearly resembles that which is hottest).
  3. The maximum in any genus is the cause of all in that genus.
  4. Therefore there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God.

The Fifth Way: Argument from Design

  1. We see that natural bodies work toward some goal, and do not do so by chance.
  2. Most natural things lack knowledge.
  3. But as an arrow reaches its target because it is directed by an archer, what lacks intelligence achieves goals by being directed by something intelligence.
  4. Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s